Re: [PATCH 1/3] gpiolib: add gpio_set_direction()

[Mark Brown]

On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 09:51:08AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> On Saturday 27 February 2010, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Indeed, but some devices do implement a distinct tristate state for  
> > input mode pins (disabling interrupt generation logic and so on for  
> > example).

> That's a pretty sloppy usage of the term "tristate" ... yeah, there
> are people who take glee in abusing terminology to introduce confusion,
> and some of them write technical manuals with little regard to normal
> usage of terms (or trademarks, which do exist for "tristate").

It's a bit clearer when the pins have multiple functions of which GPIO
is only one - normally the tristate is something that applies over all
the functions of the GPIO.

> IRQ generation logic should be disabled until request_irq() code paths
> report otherwise.   And regardless, whether a GPIO triggers an IRQ has
> nothing at all to do with its "direction".

This is an internal Linux implementation issue rather than a hardware
one - that was just an example one of the things that tristating the pin
rather than just putting it into input mode does.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/