Re: [PATCH] udf: use ext2_find_next_bit

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:04, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 15:29, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 2010/2/25 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 02:38, Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> 2010/2/25 Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>:
>>>>> On Tue 23-02-10 23:11:13, Akinobu Mita wrote:
>>>>>> Use ext2_find_next_bit (generic_find_next_le_bit) to find the set bit
>>>>>> in little endian bitmap region.
>>>
>>> Is any of this in linux-next now?
>>>
>>> http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/2208481/
>>> | fs/udf/balloc.c:274: error: implicit declaration of function
>>> 'generic_find_next_le_bit'
>>
>> Yep, Jan's patch caused the build breakage.
>>
>> Because generic_find_next_le_bit() is not available for all
>> archtectures. So we should use ext2_find_next_bit() here.
>
> Most architectures use the definitions in asm-generic, so they're OK.
> M68k doesn't. S390 is also affected, and I think arm as well (but there's no
> arm all-modconfig build in linux-next, so I'm not 100% sure).
>
> I'm cooking a patch...