Re: [PATCH] sha: prevent removal of memset as dead store in sha1_update()

From: Andi Kleen
Date: Fri Feb 26 2010 - 06:55:23 EST


roel kluin <roel.kluin@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> And it's wrong because the reason the memset() is there seems to be
>> to clear out key information that might exist kernel stack so that
>> it's more difficult for rogue code to get at things.
>
> If the memset is optimized away then the clear out does not occur. Do you
> know a different way to fix this? I observed this with:

You could always cast to volatile before memsetting?

-Andi

--
ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/