Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] enhance sysfs rfkill interface

[Henrique de Moraes Holschuh]

On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, florian@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> /sys/class/rfkill/rfkill[0-9]+/hw: (ro)
> 	hardblock kill state
> /sys/class/rfkill/rfkill[0-9]+/sw: (rw)
> 	softblock kill state
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Mickler <florian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
> I am not shure about those names.

I don't like them.  IMHO, you don't gain anything by being this terse, and
it is difficult to understand what they mean at first glance.

> Other alternatives: 
> [hs]w_block
> block_[hs]w

Any of those would be good, IMHO.  As would be more verbose variants like:
hardware_blocked, software_blocked, etc.

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/