Re: [async_tx-next PATCH 2/2] fsldma: Fix cookie issues

From: Ira W. Snyder
Date: Thu Feb 25 2010 - 14:25:46 EST


On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 09:26:13PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Feb 2010, Steven J. Magnani wrote:
>
> > diff -uprN a/include/linux/dmaengine.h b/include/linux/dmaengine.h
> > --- a/include/linux/dmaengine.h 2010-02-22 11:18:11.000000000 -0600
> > +++ b/include/linux/dmaengine.h 2010-02-22 11:18:30.000000000 -0600
> > @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@
> > * if dma_cookie_t is >0 it's a DMA request cookie, <0 it's an error code
> > */
> > typedef s32 dma_cookie_t;
> > +#define DMA_MIN_COOKIE 1
> > +#define DMA_MAX_COOKIE 2147483647
>
> Taking into account, that dma_cookie_t is 32 bits:
>
> +#define DMA_MAX_COOKIE ((1 << 31) - 1)
>

Steven,

After you take Guennadi's comment into acount, the rest of the patch
looks good. I'm sure I've never rolled the cookie around during testing.

Ira
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/