Re: [PATCH 1/3] picolcd: driver for PicoLCD HID device

From: Rick L. Vinyard, Jr.
Date: Thu Feb 25 2010 - 10:35:13 EST


Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Feb 2010, Rick L. Vinyard, Jr. wrote:
>
>> The key difference is the replacement of spin_lock() with spin_trylock()
>> such that if the non-interrupt code has already obtained the lock, the
>> interrupt will not deadlock but instead take the else path and schedule
>> a
>> framebuffer update at the next interval.
>
> Why is _irqsave() and/or deferred work not enough? The aproach with
> _trylock() seems to be overly complicated for no good reason (I personally
> become very suspicious every time I see code that is using _trylock()).
>

I was concerned about _irqsave() because the lock is split across two
functions to protect the urb after it is handed off to the usb subsystem
with usb_submit_urb(). It's locked in g13_fb_send() and unlocked in the
urb completion callback.

As for deferred work, the g13_fb_send() is the I/O portion of the deferred
framebuffer callback. I was concerned that without a lock one deferred
update could hand the urb off to the usb subsystem and a second could try
to access it before it was handed back to the driver.

In this case the _trylock() would fail and in the else patch we would
defer yet again until the next update cycle.

I took this approach because usb_interrupt_msg() couldn't be used from an
interrupt context, such as a resume hook because eventually down the chain
it does a wait_for_completion_timeout().

It has the added benefit of reusing the urb instead of creating a new one
for each framebuffer sent out, but that wasn't a reason... just a side
effect.

The downside is that I had to manage the urb.

One thing I could do is forget about directly calling g13_fb_send() from
any context and instead use the deferred framebuffer workqueue.

That's probably a simpler approach anyway.

> [ by the way, Rick, are you planning to resubmit the G13 driver with
> incorporated feedback from the last review round? ]
>

Yes. I just wanted to get the details of suspend/resume worked out before
resubmitting.

--

Rick

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/