Re: [PATCH 08/12] perf: export some syscall metadata

From: Tom Zanussi
Date: Thu Feb 25 2010 - 01:10:01 EST


On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 02:52 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:00:43AM -0600, Tom Zanussi wrote:
> > You can skip the syscall metadata patches (7-11) and things will still
> > work - you'll just get syscall numbers in the output instead of the
> > nicer syscall names.
> >
> > When the event injection stuff is ready, I can re-implement those
> > patches on top of it - it shouldn't be a big deal.
>
>
> Yeah, this looks more reasonable I think. The 7th patch can still
> go on though, as it deals with syscall numbers, not yet names, so
> it's fine.
>
> Ah and I'm keeping the 12th patch too (documentation) with some
> few modifications, just to tell people syscall names are not yet
> supported.
>
> I've tested the set and played with it. It works very well.
>
> Actually this work is just amazing. It's so easy to generate
> a script for any perf.data, with the right things inside, easy
> to modify as the callbacks are intuitive.
>
> I'm pushing that right away so happily...
>

Great! Thanks for reviewing and pushing it all.

Tom

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/