Re: x86: get rid of the insane TIF_ABI_PENDING bit

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Mon Feb 15 2010 - 14:11:19 EST


On 02/15/2010 08:17 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>> +
>> + /* Prepare the first "return" to user space */
>> + current_thread_info()->status |= TS_COMPAT;
>
> Can't understand why we need TS_COMPAT. I assume this is correct,
> this was copied from flush_thread().
>
> What TS_COMPAT actually means? I thought it just means "the task
> is inside 32-bit syscall".
>
> If a 64bit task execs a 32bit app, can't this TS_COMPAT break, say,
> syscall_get_arguments() ?
>
> Just curious, I don't really understand COMPAT issues anyway.
>

I suspect the purpose of TS_COMPAT is actually so you can ptrace() the
newly exec'd process (and see it as a 32-bit process!) before it returns
to userspace. The comment, obviously, is wrong -- that again refers to
TIF_IA32.

-hpa

--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/