Re: x86: get rid of the insane TIF_ABI_PENDING bit

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Mon Feb 15 2010 - 11:19:13 EST


commit 05d43ed8a89c159ff641d472f970e3f1baa66318
Author: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu Jan 28 22:14:43 2010 -0800

> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h
> @@ -181,14 +181,8 @@ do { \
> void start_thread_ia32(struct pt_regs *regs, u32 new_ip, u32 new_sp);
> #define compat_start_thread start_thread_ia32
>
> -#define COMPAT_SET_PERSONALITY(ex) \
> -do { \
> - if (test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32)) \
> - clear_thread_flag(TIF_ABI_PENDING); \
> - else \
> - set_thread_flag(TIF_ABI_PENDING); \
> - current->personality |= force_personality32; \
> -} while (0)
> +void set_personality_ia32(void);
> +#define COMPAT_SET_PERSONALITY(ex) set_personality_ia32()

OK, but what about force_personality32? With this patch it becomes
unused?

> +void set_personality_ia32(void)
> +{
> + /* inherit personality from parent */
> +
> + /* Make sure to be in 32bit mode */
> + set_thread_flag(TIF_IA32);
> +
> + /* Prepare the first "return" to user space */
> + current_thread_info()->status |= TS_COMPAT;

Can't understand why we need TS_COMPAT. I assume this is correct,
this was copied from flush_thread().

What TS_COMPAT actually means? I thought it just means "the task
is inside 32-bit syscall".

If a 64bit task execs a 32bit app, can't this TS_COMPAT break, say,
syscall_get_arguments() ?

Just curious, I don't really understand COMPAT issues anyway.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/