Re: [PATCH 2/9] proc_devtree: fix THIS_MODULE without module.h

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 09:02 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Commit e22f628395432b967f2f505858c64450f7835365 introduced a build
> breakage for ARM devtree work: the THIS_MODULE macro was added, but we
> don't have module.h
> 
> This change adds the necessary #include to get THIS_MODULE defined.
> While we could just replace it with NULL (PROC_FS is a bool, not a
> tristate), using THIS_MODULE will prevent unexpected breakage if we
> ever do compile this as a module.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
> 
>  fs/proc/proc_devtree.c |    1 +
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> index 0ec4511..f8650dc 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/proc_devtree.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include <linux/stat.h>
>  #include <linux/string.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <asm/prom.h>
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>  #include "internal.h"


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/