Re: [PATCH] regulator: Provide optional dummy regulator for consumers

[Grazvydas Ignotas]

On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 1:26 AM, Mark Brown
<broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2010, at 23:01, Grazvydas Ignotas <notasas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Mark Brown
>> <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> In order to ease transitions with drivers are boards start using
>>> regulators
>>> provide an option to cause all regulator_get() calls to succeed, with a
>>> dummy always on regulator being supplied where one has not been
>>> configured.
>>> A warning is printed whenever the dummy regulator is used to aid system
>>> development.
>>>
>>> This regulator does not implement any regulator operations but will allow
>>> simple consumers which only do enable() and disable() calls to run. It
>>> is kept separate from the fixed voltage regulator to avoid Kconfig
>>> confusion on the part of users when it is extended to allow boards to
>>> explicitly use the dummy regulator to simplify cases where the majority
>>> of supplies are from fixed regulators without software control.
>>>
>>> This option is currently only effective for systems which do not specify
>>> full constriants. If required an override could also be provided to allow
>>> these systems to use the dummy regulator, though it is likely that
>>> unconfigured supplies on such systems will lead to error due to
>>> regulators being powered down more aggressively when not in use.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>
>>
>> hm, tried intentionally nuking regulator setup on my board to test
>> dummy and drivers started failing on regulator_enable() with -1
>> (EPERM?). Looks like dummy doesn't have constraints defined, so not
>> much use of this if _enable() is failing anyway.
>
> Hrmpf. That was working for me - are you running the latest regulator code?
> There was a bug where it was requiring CHANGE_STATUS even if the regulator
> is always on, which isn't sensible since there is no possibility of actually
> changing the status. It should now only be checking for permission to change
> status if it would actually do so. There was also a patch yesterday to make
> regulators that don't define an is_enabled() report as enabled.

Oh, it appears I was missing those patches (they were not in last
linux-lest yet), now everything works as expected, thanks.

>
>> BTW, drivers/mmc/host/omap_hsmmc.c has quite a lot of logic related to
>> vcc_aux being available or not (vcc_aux is typically used to power
>> some MMC pins and is unused on devices with SD cards, like pandora). I
>> wonder if it may cause some functionality change there.
>
> Yeah, quite possibly. This sort of stuff is one of the reasons it's much
> nicer to specify full constraints where possible; it allows drivers that can
> have missing supplies to handle that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/