Re: [PATCH 0/8] tip related: radix tree for spareseirq and logical flat clean up

[Eric W. Biederman]

"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 02/12/2010 07:44 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> 
>> Thanks for keeping this work alive.
>> 
>
> Indeed.  I am hoping to put this in tip tomorrow or so.
>
>> I just skimmed through do_IRQ and I happened to notice that
>> we have an unnecessary inefficiency that using a radix tree for
>> irq_to_desc will magnify.
>> 
>> handle_irq should take an struct irq_desc * instead of a unsigned int irq.
>> 
>> and the per cpu vector_irq array should become a per cpu vector_desc array.
>> 
>> As soon as irq_to_desc is more than &irq_desc[irq] this saves us work
>> and cache line misses  at the cost of a simple code cleanup.
>
> Good catch.  I haven't looked through the details yet, but I presume
> this can be done on top of this changeset?

Codewise the changes should be completely independent.



Probably the trickiest bit is that drivers/xen/events.c calls handle_irq
and makes handle_irq on ia64 a wrapper for __do_IRQ.

Jeremy is there any good reason why drivers/xen/events.c does not just do:

desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
if (desc)
	generic_handle_irq_desc(irq, desc);

And instead introduces a weird one-off xen specific multi-arch function?


Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/