Re: [PATCH 26/28] kdb,panic,debug_core: Allow the debug core toreceive a panic before smp_send_stop()

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Fri Feb 12 2010 - 18:01:45 EST


On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:35:41 -0600 Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> It is highly desirable to trap into kdb on panic,

s/kdb/kgdb/

But is it necessary to do it in-kernel? Why not just put a
breakpoint at panic(), add that to your .gdbinit?

> diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c
> index c787333..428d15b 100644
> --- a/kernel/panic.c
> +++ b/kernel/panic.c
> @@ -66,10 +66,13 @@ NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...)
> */
> preempt_disable();
>
> - bust_spinlocks(1);
> va_start(args, fmt);
> vsnprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), fmt, args);
> va_end(args);
> +
> + atomic_notifier_call_chain(&panic_notifier_list, 0, buf);
> +
> + bust_spinlocks(1);
> printk(KERN_EMERG "Kernel panic - not syncing: %s\n",buf);
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE
> dump_stack();
> @@ -91,8 +94,6 @@ NORET_TYPE void panic(const char * fmt, ...)
> */
> smp_send_stop();
>
> - atomic_notifier_call_chain(&panic_notifier_list, 0, buf);
> -
> bust_spinlocks(0);
>
> if (!panic_blink)

So the notifier call now happens before all the printks and the kexec
and kmsg_dump handling. What effect does this have upon the code which
implements kexec and kmsg_dump?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/