Re: [PATCH] sysfs: differentiate between locking links and non-links

[Tejun Heo]

Hello,

On 02/12/2010 10:20 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> My reasoning is that we effectively get an active reference on directories
> for free because we have to delete the children before we can delete a
> directory.

Yeah, as long as we guarantee that all children are removed before the
parent, I think we're in the clear.  The group handling seems
problematic (w/ or w/o the patch) but yeap Ack on removing
get_active_two.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/