Re: [kernel.org users] XZ Migration discussion

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Thu Feb 11 2010 - 17:32:29 EST


On 02/11/2010 12:51 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> Option 1)
>>
>> Leave gz as the master, and migrate bz2 to xz. This will happen in
>> stages obviously. with bz2 ultimately being phased out.
>>
>> Migration option 1)
>>
>> All new content would be provided in .bz2 and .xz with
>> an ultimate date set that the .bz2 files would stop
>> being generated with new content. This would leave all
>> existing content alone and it would not be a migration
>> of the current .bz2 files to xz
>
> I believe this is cleanest. gzip has performance advantages, and old
> files suddenly disappearing would be just weird.
>

It would also be "just weird" to:

a) require that the end user knows the particular compression format
used by a particular legacy file.
b) having to have the mirror system deal with a mix of .bz2 and .xz files.

-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/