Re: [RFC perf,x86] P4 PMU early draft

[Cyrill Gorcunov]

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 01:21:58PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 11:52 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > which suggests we should simply remove that cpu argument 
> 
> The below patch does so for all in-tree bits.
> 
> Doing this patch reminded me of the mess that is
> hw_perf_group_sched_in(), so I'm going to try and fix that next.
> 

Yes Peter, thanks! At least for me this patch makes code more
understandable :)

	-- Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/