Re: i2c_powermac: Kernel access of bad area

From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Date: Fri Jan 29 2010 - 16:36:00 EST



> Ben, what about applying this patch of mine, as Christian reported it
> fixed his oops?

Sure. I never quite know with i2c which ones you will apply directly and
which ones you want to go through my tree :-)

Hopefully they should still be referened on patchwork, I'll dig there
and pick them up.

Cheers,
Ben.

> > > However, the "Badness" remains when I try to modprobe i2c-powermac again:
> > >
> > > [ 442.148222] PowerMac i2c bus pmu 2 registered
> > > [ 442.148792] PowerMac i2c bus pmu 1 registered
> > > [ 442.149299] PowerMac i2c bus mac-io 0 registered
> > > [ 442.163573] adt746x: ADT7467 initializing
> > > [ 442.170072] adt746x: Lowering max temperatures from 73, 80, 109 to 67, 47, 67
> > > [ 442.176559] PowerMac i2c bus uni-n 1 registered
> > > [ 442.227115] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/devices/ams'
> > > [ 442.227697] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > [ 442.228176] Badness at fs/sysfs/dir.c:487
> > > [ 442.228642] NIP: c00eb71c LR: c00eb71c CTR: 00000000
> > > [ 442.229117] REGS: eea0fa50 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (2.6.33-rc3)
> > > [ 442.229592] MSR: 00029032 <EE,ME,CE,IR,DR> CR: 42008444 XER: 00000000
> > > [ 442.230151] TASK = eea10000[2821] 'modprobe' THREAD: eea0e000
> > > [ 442.230191] GPR00: c00eb71c eea0fb00 eea10000 0000004c 000064c6 ffffffff ffffffff 00000000
> > > [ 442.230758] GPR08: efa71740 c03e0000 00000000 000064c6 44008428 10020390 100e0000 100df49c
> > > [ 442.231326] GPR16: 100b54c0 100df49c 100ddd20 1018fb08 100b5340 c03e674c c03e6720 c03ea044
> > > [ 442.231902] GPR24: 00000000 24008422 ffffffea eea0fb58 ef0e9000 ef0e9000 ef0a9ea0 ffffffef
> > > [ 442.233187] NIP [c00eb71c] sysfs_add_one+0x94/0xc0
> > > [ 442.233695] LR [c00eb71c] sysfs_add_one+0x94/0xc0
> > > [ 442.234363] Call Trace:
> > >
> > > I've put the whole dmesg on:
> > >
> > > http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.33-rc2/i2c_powermac/r1/
> >
> > Hmm. Looks like a different but somewhat similar problem in the ams
> > driver: some code that is in ams_exit() (the module exit code) should
> > instead be called when the device (not module) is removed. It probably
> > doesn't make much of a difference in the PMU case, but in the I2C case
> > it does matter.
> >
> > The following, totally untested patch may fix it. I make no guarantee
> > that my code isn't racy though, I'm not familiar enough with the ams
> > driver code to tell for sure.
> >
> > ---
> > drivers/hwmon/ams/ams-core.c | 11 +++++++----
> > drivers/hwmon/ams/ams-i2c.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/hwmon/ams/ams-pmu.c | 2 ++
> > drivers/hwmon/ams/ams.h | 1 +
> > 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.33-rc3.orig/drivers/hwmon/ams/ams-core.c 2009-06-10 05:05:27.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6.33-rc3/drivers/hwmon/ams/ams-core.c 2010-01-07 17:14:25.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ int __init ams_init(void)
> > return -ENODEV;
> > }
> >
> > -void ams_exit(void)
> > +void ams_sensor_detach(void)
> > {
> > /* Remove input device */
> > ams_input_exit();
> > @@ -221,9 +221,6 @@ void ams_exit(void)
> > /* Remove attributes */
> > device_remove_file(&ams_info.of_dev->dev, &dev_attr_current);
> >
> > - /* Shut down implementation */
> > - ams_info.exit();
> > -
> > /* Flush interrupt worker
> > *
> > * We do this after ams_info.exit(), because an interrupt might
> > @@ -239,6 +236,12 @@ void ams_exit(void)
> > pmf_unregister_irq_client(&ams_freefall_client);
> > }
> >
> > +static void __exit ams_exit(void)
> > +{
> > + /* Shut down implementation */
> > + ams_info.exit();
> > +}
> > +
> > MODULE_AUTHOR("Stelian Pop, Michael Hanselmann");
> > MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Apple Motion Sensor driver");
> > MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > --- linux-2.6.33-rc3.orig/drivers/hwmon/ams/ams-i2c.c 2009-06-10 05:05:27.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6.33-rc3/drivers/hwmon/ams/ams-i2c.c 2010-01-07 17:12:46.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -238,6 +238,8 @@ static int ams_i2c_probe(struct i2c_clie
> > static int ams_i2c_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
> > {
> > if (ams_info.has_device) {
> > + ams_sensor_detach();
> > +
> > /* Disable interrupts */
> > ams_i2c_set_irq(AMS_IRQ_ALL, 0);
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.33-rc3.orig/drivers/hwmon/ams/ams-pmu.c 2009-06-10 05:05:27.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6.33-rc3/drivers/hwmon/ams/ams-pmu.c 2010-01-07 17:13:47.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ static void ams_pmu_get_xyz(s8 *x, s8 *y
> >
> > static void ams_pmu_exit(void)
> > {
> > + ams_sensor_detach();
> > +
> > /* Disable interrupts */
> > ams_pmu_set_irq(AMS_IRQ_ALL, 0);
> >
> > --- linux-2.6.33-rc3.orig/drivers/hwmon/ams/ams.h 2009-06-10 05:05:27.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6.33-rc3/drivers/hwmon/ams/ams.h 2010-01-07 17:11:43.000000000 +0100
> > @@ -61,6 +61,7 @@ extern struct ams ams_info;
> >
> > extern void ams_sensors(s8 *x, s8 *y, s8 *z);
> > extern int ams_sensor_attach(void);
> > +extern void ams_sensor_detach(void);
> >
> > extern int ams_pmu_init(struct device_node *np);
> > extern int ams_i2c_init(struct device_node *np);
>
> Christian, did you ever test this second patch of mine? If you did,
> what was the outcome?
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/