Re: [PATCHv3 2/2] powerpc: implement arch_scale_smt_power for Power7

[Joel Schopp]

Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 17:24 -0600, Joel Schopp wrote:
>   
> > On Power7 processors running in SMT4 mode with 2, 3, or 4 idle threads 
> > there is performance benefit to idling the higher numbered threads in
> > the core.  
> >
> > This patch implements arch_scale_smt_power to dynamically update smt
> > thread power in these idle cases in order to prefer threads 0,1 over
> > threads 2,3 within a core.
> >     
>
> Almost there :-) Joel, Peter, can you help me figure something out tho ?
>
> On machine that don't have SMT, I would like to avoid calling
> arch_scale_smt_power() at all if possible (in addition to not compiling
> it in if SMT is not enabled in .config).
>
> Now, I must say I'm utterly confused by how the domains are setup and I
> haven't quite managed to sort it out... it looks to me that
> SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER is always going to be set on all CPUs when the config
> option is set (though each CPU will have its own domain) or am I
> misguided ? IE. Is there any sense in having at least a fast exit path
> out of arch_scale_smt_power() for non-SMT CPUs ?
>
> Joel, can you look at compiling it out when SMT is not set ? We don't
> want to bloat SMP kernels for 32-bit non-SMT embedded platforms.
>   
I can wrap the powerpc definition of arch_scale_smt in an #ifdef, if 
it's not there the scheduler uses the default, which is the same as it 
uses if SMT isn't compiled. 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/