Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86,hw_breakpoint,kgdb: kgdb to usehw_breakpointAPI

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 02:23:13PM -0600, Jason Wessel wrote:
> Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 01:58:26PM -0600, Jason Wessel wrote:
> >   
> >> New version which loses the call back registration, because if we
> >> register as a different breakpoint type, perf won't reject it.
> >>     
> >
> >
> >
> > I don't understand what you mean here.
> >
> >
> >
> >   
> 
> This was the change:
> 
> -       attr.bp_type = HW_BREAKPOINT_X;
> +       attr.bp_type = HW_BREAKPOINT_W;
> 
> The perf API had extra constraint checks when you did not have a call
> back function and the type was HW_BREAKPOINT_X.   Using the
> HW_BREAKPOINT_W type avoids the extra checks that would not allow me to
> register without providing a call back.  


Oh, where have you seen this?



> > Ok. Well, let's go for it, as it's a regression that
> > needs to be fixed anyway.
> >
> > But we'll need to sanitize various things after that :)
> >   
> 
> 
> Agreed. 
> 
> Can I take that to mean you have acked this version of the patch?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jason.


Yep, please add my ack.

Thanks!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/