Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf,hw_breakpoint,kgdb: No mutex taken forkerneldebugger

[Jason Wessel]

Frederic Weisbecker wrote:

>> If it fails the debugger tried to remove it again later.   It seems to
>> me like it is a don't care corner case.   You get a printk if it ever
>> does happen (which it really shouldn't).
> 
> 
> 
> Yeah truly it's a corner case, especially if the debugger can handle that
> later.
> 
> May be just add a comment so that future reviewers don't stick to
> this part.


If you approve, I'll add your ack.


It looks like this now:


+static int hw_break_release_slot(int breakno)
+{
+	struct perf_event **pevent;
+	int cpu;
+
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+		pevent = per_cpu_ptr(breakinfo[breakno].pev, cpu);
+		if (dbg_release_bp_slot(*pevent))
+			/*
+			 * The debugger is responisble for handing the retry on
+			 * remove failure.
+			 */
+			return -1;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+



Thanks,
Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/