Re: [PATCH] ftrace: unify arch_syscall_addr() implementations

From: Mike Frysinger
Date: Tue Jan 26 2010 - 23:51:24 EST


On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:36, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 08:43 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> Every arch_syscall_addr() implementation thus far is the same, so unify
>> them as a default weak in common code so more arches don't have to waste
>> time copying & pasting this simple function. ÂThe Blackfin version is
>> going to be exactly the same.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> note: only thing that needs double checking is s390 and sparc where they
>> declared the sys_call_table as an array of ints. Âconsidering this table
>> is supposed to be an array of function pointers, this seems like more of
>> a typo to me ...
>
> I would not be too sure. s390 is very strange, and I would definitely
> want to get an Ack from the arch maintainers first.

i think everyone has checked in with v3 ...
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/