Re: [PATCH 01/01] regulator: support max8649

[Haojian Zhuang]

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 6:01 AM, Liam Girdwood <lrg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-26 at 01:26 -0500, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
>> From 2b5a73c336d2b5dc48c8cf1f2a804b6968659f78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 10:24:09 -0500
>> Subject: [PATCH] regulator: enable max8649 regulator driver
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Can you confirm all the changes compared to the last version.
>
Yes, exactly.

>> +static int max8649_get_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
>> +{
>> +       struct max8649_regulator_info *info = rdev_get_drvdata(rdev);
>> +       unsigned char data;
>> +       int ret;
>> +
>> +       ret = max8649_reg_read(info->i2c, info->vol_reg);
>> +       if (ret < 0)
>> +               return ret;
>> +       data = (unsigned char)ret & MAX8649_VOL_MASK;
>> +       return (max8649_list_voltage(rdev, data));
>
> Any reason why we have extra () here ?
>
Fixed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/