Re: IO error semantics

[tytso]

On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:23:57AM -0500, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> 
> For permanent write errors, I would expect any modern drive to do a
> sector remapping internally. We should never need to track this kind
> of information for any modern device that I know of (S-ATA, SAS,
> SSD's and raid arrays should all handle this).

... and if the device is run out of all of its blocks in its spare
blocks pool, it's probably well past the time to replace said disk.

BTW, I really liked Dave Chinner's summary of the issues involved; I
ran into Kawai-san last week at Linux.conf.au, and we discussed pretty
much the same thing over lunch.  (i.e., that it's a hard problem, and
in some cases we need to retry the writes, such as a transient FC path
problem --- but some kind of write throttling is critical or we could
end up choking the VM due to too many pages getting dirtied and no way
of cleaning them.)

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/