Re: [2.6.33-rc5 regression] NULL pointer dereference invlan_skb_recv - probably introduced by commit9793241fe92f7d9303fb221e43fc598eb065f267

From: Alexey Dobriyan
Date: Sun Jan 24 2010 - 02:17:48 EST

Next message: Mike Galbraith: "Re: Bisected rcu hang (kernel/sched.c): was 2.6.33rc4 RCU hang mmspin_lock deadlock(?) after running libvirtd - reproducible."
Previous message: AmÃrico Wang: "Re: [2.6.33-rc5 regression] NULL pointer dereference invlan_skb_recv - probably introduced by commit9793241fe92f7d9303fb221e43fc598eb065f267"
In reply to: AmÃrico Wang: "Re: [2.6.33-rc5 regression] NULL pointer dereference invlan_skb_recv - probably introduced by commit9793241fe92f7d9303fb221e43fc598eb065f267"
Next in thread: AmÃrico Wang: "Re: [2.6.33-rc5 regression] NULL pointer dereference invlan_skb_recv - probably introduced by commit9793241fe92f7d9303fb221e43fc598eb065f267"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Jan 24, 2010 at 03:12:52PM +0800, Américo Wang wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 04:56:57PM +0100, Bruno Prémont wrote:
> >Today I tried out 2.6.33-rc5 but always got crashing system:
> >
> >[ 26.390576] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
> >[ 26.396369] IP: [<df856b89>] vlan_skb_recv+0x89/0x280 [8021q]
>
>
> What does 'addr2line -e vmlinux 0xdf856b89' say?

EIP is in module, so it will say nothing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/