Re: [PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resumeif KMS is used

From: Alan Cox
Date: Sat Jan 23 2010 - 19:22:20 EST

Next message: Ralf Baechle: "Re: [PATCH] MIPS: cleanup switches with cases that can be merged"
Previous message: Mark Seaborn: "futex() on vdso makes process unkillable"
In reply to: Rafael J. Wysocki: "[PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> I've been testing this patch for over a week and haven't seen a single problem
> related to it during this time.
>
> Are there any objections to it?

Usual question 8) - explain the locking. What happens if we suspend as
kms is initialising/being removed.

Also what happens if you have KMS and non KMS consoles both active
through the frame buffer off different cards ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Ralf Baechle: "Re: [PATCH] MIPS: cleanup switches with cases that can be merged"
Previous message: Mark Seaborn: "futex() on vdso makes process unkillable"
In reply to: Rafael J. Wysocki: "[PATCH] PM / i915: Skip kernel VT switch during suspend/resume if KMS is used"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]