[28/29] perf events: Dont report side-band events on each cpu for per-task-per-cpu events

From: Greg KH
Date: Fri Jan 22 2010 - 19:20:56 EST


2.6.32-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>

commit 5d27c23df09b702868d9a3bff86ec6abd22963ac upstream.

Acme noticed that his FORK/MMAP numbers were inflated by about
the same factor as his cpu-count.

This led to the discovery of a few more sites that need to
respect the event->cpu filter.

Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@xxxxxxxxx>
LKML-Reference: <20091217121830.215333434@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
kernel/perf_event.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -1359,6 +1359,9 @@ static void perf_ctx_adjust_freq(struct
if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
continue;

+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ continue;
+
hwc = &event->hw;

interrupts = hwc->interrupts;
@@ -3226,6 +3229,9 @@ static void perf_event_task_output(struc

static int perf_event_task_match(struct perf_event *event)
{
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
if (event->attr.comm || event->attr.mmap || event->attr.task)
return 1;

@@ -3262,6 +3268,7 @@ static void perf_event_task_event(struct
ctx = rcu_dereference(task_event->task->perf_event_ctxp);
if (ctx)
perf_event_task_ctx(ctx, task_event);
+ put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
rcu_read_unlock();
}

@@ -3338,6 +3345,9 @@ static void perf_event_comm_output(struc

static int perf_event_comm_match(struct perf_event *event)
{
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
if (event->attr.comm)
return 1;

@@ -3378,7 +3388,6 @@ static void perf_event_comm_event(struct

cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
perf_event_comm_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, comm_event);
- put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);

rcu_read_lock();
/*
@@ -3388,6 +3397,7 @@ static void perf_event_comm_event(struct
ctx = rcu_dereference(current->perf_event_ctxp);
if (ctx)
perf_event_comm_ctx(ctx, comm_event);
+ put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
rcu_read_unlock();
}

@@ -3462,6 +3472,9 @@ static void perf_event_mmap_output(struc
static int perf_event_mmap_match(struct perf_event *event,
struct perf_mmap_event *mmap_event)
{
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
if (event->attr.mmap)
return 1;

@@ -3539,7 +3552,6 @@ got_name:

cpuctx = &get_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
perf_event_mmap_ctx(&cpuctx->ctx, mmap_event);
- put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);

rcu_read_lock();
/*
@@ -3549,6 +3561,7 @@ got_name:
ctx = rcu_dereference(current->perf_event_ctxp);
if (ctx)
perf_event_mmap_ctx(ctx, mmap_event);
+ put_cpu_var(perf_cpu_context);
rcu_read_unlock();

kfree(buf);
@@ -3811,6 +3824,9 @@ static int perf_swevent_match(struct per
enum perf_type_id type,
u32 event_id, struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ return 0;
+
if (!perf_swevent_is_counting(event))
return 0;



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/