Re: [patch 0/3] sched: Make Priority Inheritance POSIX compliant

From: Carsten Emde
Date: Wed Jan 20 2010 - 20:00:36 EST


On 01/20/2010 09:58 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The current PI implementation violates POSIX scheduling semantics when
> a thread is deboosted. The following patch series addresses this.

I can confirm that this patch series fixes the incorrect scheduling
behavior as observed in our test case.

Thanks, Thomas!

Tested-by: Carsten Emde <cbe@xxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/