Re: what's up with "make -j N" output?

[Ralf Baechle]

On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:24:14PM +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:

> Script does effectively:
> 
> 	make -k -j5 &>1.log

My automated builds effectively run a number of "make -j 1" builds in
parallel so I get sane parsable and readable logs.  I don't think we
give any guarantees for -j 2 or higher even though that would be highly
desirable when things go wrong.

  Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/