Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure

From: Stephen Rothwell
Date: Tue Jan 19 2010 - 06:34:59 EST

Next message: Alberto Panizzo: "[PATCH v2] regulator: mc13783: consider Power Gates as digitalregulators."
Previous message: Mel Gorman: "Re: Performance regression in scsi sequential throughput (iozone)due to "e084b - page-allocator: preserve PFN ordering when__GFP_COLD is set""
In reply to: Samuel Ortiz: "Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Samuel,

On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 11:59:27 +0100 Samuel Ortiz <sameo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the report. It should be all fixed now.

Thanks.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Next message: Alberto Panizzo: "[PATCH v2] regulator: mc13783: consider Power Gates as digitalregulators."
Previous message: Mel Gorman: "Re: Performance regression in scsi sequential throughput (iozone)due to "e084b - page-allocator: preserve PFN ordering when__GFP_COLD is set""
In reply to: Samuel Ortiz: "Re: linux-next: mfd tree build failure"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]