Re: [PATCHSET] concurrency managed workqueue, take#3

[Stefan Richter]

Tejun Heo wrote:
> slow-work is probably the largest chunk which can be replaced by cmwq
> but as shown in the libata case small conversions can bring noticeable
> benefits and there are other places which have had to deal with
> similar limitations.

I for one as driver programmer am keen on cmwq.  It would help me fix a
lack of parallelism in firewire (target probe/ reconnect/ removal in the
storage driver).  I can implement what I have in mind with slow-work too
but cmwq would take less effort and LOC.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==-=- ---= =--=-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/