Re: [patch 0/6] cpumask_of_node() should handle -1 as a node

From: Anton Blanchard
Date: Mon Jan 11 2010 - 21:06:18 EST


> So.. what's happening here? Nobody has applied the patches anywhere,
> you later said "the scheduler oopses in a number of places with
> CPUMASK_OFFSTACK and sparse node ids" and mention of a -stable backport
> was mentioned.

Just checked and it's already upstream on ia64. That just leaves alpha.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at