Re: [RFC PATCH] sched: Pass affine target cpu into wake_affine

From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Thu Jan 07 2010 - 22:34:39 EST


On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 10:38 +0800, Lin Ming wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 21:14 +0800, Mike Galbraith wrote:

> > Below is a complete retest. Mind testing my hacklet? I bet a nickle
> > it'll work at least as well as yours on your beefy boxen.
>
> I tested your hacklet on below 2 machines as before.
>
> Tigerton x86_64 machine: 16cpus(4P/4Cores), 40G mem
> IA64 machine: 32cpus(4P/4Cores/HT), 16G mem
>
> Test1: vmark regression fix patch + pass affine target
> Test2: this hacklet
>
> Compared with upstream 2.6.33-rc2,
> Test1: Tigerton +3%, IA64 +15%
> Test2: Tigerton +3%, IA64 +10%
>
> The test2 also improves on IA64, although not as good as test1.

Dang, I owe you a nickle. Thanks a bunch for giving it a go.

Interesting result. It's not really making much sense why you see a
peak gain, while I see peak loss. Radical behavior difference :-/

I think the ramp only (and harder) approach is safer, but we'll see.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/