Re: [PATCH] lib/vsprintf.c: Add %pMF to format FDDI bit reversedMAC addresses

[Simon Horman]

On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 02:09:42PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 20:42:12 +0000 (GMT)
> 
> >  What's the gain?  I'd be rather conservative when taking everybody's 56 
> > bytes for one or two drivers hardly anybody uses.  The format of MAC 
> > addresses is unlikely to change, so I'd say the sources can live with 
> > one or two places where the strings are formatted manually.  Even if the 
> > drivers lose more than these 56 bytes.
> 
> We gain consistency.  You know, the part that's completely bolixed
> right now?
> 
> I'm applying Joe's patch and followon patches to make the driver's
> use the new printf format.

In the vein of this, would it be worth adding some modifier to %i4 to
print addresses for ftp helpers? That is, %u,%u,%u,%u. I think
there are currently two users of that format string after Joe's latest
round of updates.

The users are net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ftp.c and
net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_ftp.c. Prior to Joe's latest
changes ip_vs_ftp.c used %d,%d,%d,%d.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/