Re: [RFC][PATCH 6/8] mm: handle_speculative_fault()

[Linus Torvalds]

On Thu, 7 Jan 2010, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> Again, it doesn't matter. Old or new - if some other thread looks up the 
> vma, either is fine.

Btw, don't get me wrong. That patch may compile (I checked it), but I am 
not in any way claiming that it is anything else than a total throw-away 
"this is something we could look at doing" suggestion.

For example, I'm not at all wedded to using 'mm->page_table_lock': I in 
fact wanted to use a per-vma lock, but I picked a lock we already had. The 
fact that picking a lock we already had also means that it serializes page 
table updates (sometimes) is actually a downside, not a good thing. 

So the patch was meant to get people thinking about alternatives, rather 
than anything else.

The point being that there are things we can play with on mmap_sem, that 
don't involve getting rid of it - just being a bit more aggressive in how 
we use it.

			Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/