Re: How should we handle CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTRL_SWAP (Re: [PATCH-mmotm] build fix for memcg-move-charges-of-anonymous-swap.patch)

[Balbir Singh]

* Daisuke Nishimura <d-nishimura@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2010-01-07 20:23:35]:

> (Changed the subject and Cc list)
> 
> On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 14:52:23 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > BTW, maybe it's time to
> >   - remove EXPERIMENTAL from CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTRL_SWAP
> > and more,
> >   - remove CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTRL_SWAP
> >     (to reduce complicated #ifdefs and replace them with CONFIG_SWAP.)
> > 
> > It's very stable as far as I test.
> > 
> I agree on both.
> 
> Balbir-san, What do you think ?
>

I agree, the experimental marking can go and CONFIG_SWAP can replace
the current config option. 

-- 
	Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/