Re: [stable] [BUGFIX][PATCH v3] memcg: avoid oom-killing innocenttask in case of use_hierarchy

[Greg KH]

On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 12:26:33PM +0900, Daisuke Nishimura wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jan 2010 14:28:19 -0800
> Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 09:47:24AM +0900, Daisuke Nishimura wrote:
> > > Stable team.
> > > 
> > > Cay you pick this up for 2.6.32.y(and 2.6.31.y if it will be released) ?
> > > 
> > > This is a for-stable version of a bugfix patch that corresponds to the
> > > upstream commmit d31f56dbf8bafaacb0c617f9a6f137498d5c7aed.
> > 
> > I've applied it to the .32-stable tree, but it does not apply to .31.
> > Care to provide a version of the patch for that kernel if you want it
> > applied there?
> > 
> hmm, strange. I can apply it onto 2.6.31.9. It might conflict with other patches
> in 2.6.31.y queue ?
> Anyway, I've attached the patch that is rebased on 2.6.31.9. Please tell me if you
> have any problem with it.
> 
> v3: rebased on 2.6.31.9

This version worked, thanks for regenerating it.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/