Re: [PATCH] libsrp: fix compile failure

[Jiri Kosina]

[ added Stephen to CC ]

On Mon, 4 Jan 2010, James Bottomley wrote:

> Well, the fact that the compile failure wasn't detected before it went 
> upstream should answer that ...
> 
> But to be more specific: linux-next is our integration tree (and also
> the obscure architecture compile tree).  To ensure the best possible
> integration, every tree should be built and tested in linux-next at
> least once before it goes to Linus.  There were originally technical
> reasons why -mm wasn't in ... I just thought they'd been fixed by now.

/me checks ...

Yes, it indeed is that way -- Andew pulls whole linux-next as one of the 
patches into -mm series.

To make linux-next really working the way it is intended to work we need 
to have -mm part of it, as it is used as a last point for a non-trivial 
amount of patches before they enter Linus' tree.

Andrew, why do we have the current setup, and not the other way around?

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/