Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: avoid huge bonus to sleepers on busymachines

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 13:30 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Any diddling of sleeper fairness would have to be accompanied with a
> preemption model change methinks. 

Just told jays the exact same thing on IRC ;-)

Also, workloads are interesting, the signal test thing is the easiest to
test the preemption side, various things like QPID show the down-side
iirc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/