Re: [PATCH 0/5] reiserfs lock inversion fixes on xattr

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 10:29:44AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 at 21:42, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > I hope you can give it a try (and/or review) before I send the whole
> > > to Linus.
> > 
> > Without your patches, "dbench -x" was pretty much instantly causing the 
> > threads to lock up, forcing me to reboot the box. With LOCKDEP enabled, 
> > warnings were printed. After applying your patches (and a reboot) I've run 
> > "dbench -x" for quite a while now with different runtimes and number of
> > clients and it's not locking up any more. I've tested with:
> > 
> > CONFIG_REISERFS_FS=y
> > CONFIG_REISERFS_CHECK=y
> > CONFIG_REISERFS_PROC_INFO=y
> > CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_XATTR=y
> > CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_POSIX_ACL=y
> > # CONFIG_REISERFS_FS_SECURITY is not set
> > 
> > ...and a few "Kernel hacking" options set. Full config and dmesg:
> > 
> >    http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.33-rc1/reiserfs/t3/
> > 
> >    (although I'm not really testing -rc1 but latest mainline -git
> >     and your changes pulled)
> > 
> > So, feel free to add:
> > 
> >   Tested-by: Christian Kujau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Frederic, i'd suggest you send this tree to Linus with Christian's tested-by 
> tags added ASAP - we better have these fixes in -rc3.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> 	Ingo


Yep, done :)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/