Re: x264 benchmarks BFS vs CFS

From: Jason Garrett-Glaser
Date: Tue Dec 22 2009 - 02:40:50 EST

On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Jason Garrett-Glaser
<darkshikari@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Benchmarks for the new threading model are up, along with a few others:
> Interestingly enough, CFS beats BFS on zerolatency by a significant
> margin.  Unsurprisingly, given the threading model, the optimal number
> of threads is equal to the number of cores.
> Jason

And I am apparently blind: I cannot read graphs. Ignore the
conclusion made in the above post ;)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at