Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] Asynchronous suspend/resume - test results

From: Maxim Levitsky
Date: Mon Dec 21 2009 - 14:58:34 EST

On Mon, 2009-12-21 at 18:25 +1100, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > I'm not sure what the next step should be at this point. To me, the picture is
> > quite clear now, but perhaps we ought to run more tests on some other machines
> > or something. Please let me know what you think.
> Looks great. If you do decide you want other machines tested, I'll
> happily try the machines around here:
> - Dell M1530
> - Omnibook XE3-GF.
> - Via LN10000 based Mythtv Box
> - Desktop machine - Some Intel-based mobo I've forgotten the name of.
> I've been quietly following the thread, but have lost track of what
> iteration of the patch you're on, so if you'd give me a pointer to it,
> I'd be grateful.
> By the way, I haven't forgotten about sending some real patches for
> swsusp (ie more than just cleanups). I'm just busy with other things and
> also thinking carefully about what order to do things in.

I vote for ability to save all ram to the disk.
After several days of testing I managed to make my system do s2disk
really reliable (~300 cycles tested), but suspending when memory is
tight still fails sometimes.

I didn't yet use your tuxonice system though.

Best regards,
Maxim Levisky

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at