Re: x264 benchmarks BFS vs CFS

From: Mike Galbraith
Date: Sun Dec 20 2009 - 10:51:37 EST

On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 16:13 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-20 at 13:10 +0100, Kasper Sandberg wrote:
> > and as for CFS, it SHOULD exhibit fair behavior anyway, isnt it called
> > "completely FAIR scheduler" ? or is that just the marketing name?
> Clue: CFS _did_ distribute CPU evenly. Ponder that for a moment.

All done?

Do you think THAT may be why I thought Con might be interested?!?


To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at