Re: [stable] [PATCH 2/2] iwlwifi: unify iwl_setup_rxon_timing

From: Ike Panhc
Date: Wed Dec 16 2009 - 01:46:33 EST

Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 11:42:48AM -0800, reinette chatre wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-12-15 at 08:31 -0800, John W. Linville wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 05:49:43AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 03:02:17PM +0800, Ike Panhc wrote:
>>>>> Please consider applying to linux-2.6.31.y
>>>> I need the subsystem maintainer to agree with this, have they?
>>> It seems fine to me. You may want to let Intel comment too.
>> No objection here. Even so, I find it strange that this patch fixes a
>> problem since it really should not have any functional changes.
> Ok, if there is no functional change, why is this needed?
> Ike?
> thanks,
> greg k-h
I review the patch again. Yes, it is no functional change. Sorry I have
misunderstanding about the patch. Please do not put the second patch into

But Please consider applying the first patch (change IWL6000_UCODE_API_MAX
to v4) to 2.6.31-stable tree. It will be good to use v4 firmware on iwl6000.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at