Re: [PATCH] vmscan: limit concurrent reclaimers in shrink_zone

[Rik van Riel]

On 12/14/2009 08:08 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Rik van Riel<riel@xxxxxxxxxx>  writes:
>
> > +max_zone_concurrent_reclaim:
> > +
> > +The number of processes that are allowed to simultaneously reclaim
> > +memory from a particular memory zone.
> > +
> > +With certain workloads, hundreds of processes end up in the page
> > +reclaim code simultaneously.  This can cause large slowdowns due
> > +to lock contention, freeing of way too much memory and occasionally
> > +false OOM kills.
> > +
> > +To avoid these problems, only allow a smaller number of processes
> > +to reclaim pages from each memory zone simultaneously.
> > +
> > +The default value is 8.
>
> I don't like the hardcoded number. Is the same number good for a 128MB
> embedded system as for as 1TB server?  Seems doubtful.
>
> This should be perhaps scaled with memory size and number of CPUs?

The limit is per _zone_, so the number of concurrent reclaimers
is automatically scaled by the number of memory zones in the
system.

Scaling up the per-zone value as well looks like it could lead
to the kind of lock contention we are aiming to avoid in the
first place.

--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/