Re: [GIT PATCH] TTY patches for 2.6.33-git

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 02:09:14PM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Sun, 2009-12-13 at 20:04 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: 
> > In the above cases we have the following comment:
> > 
> > /* Protect inode->i_flock using the BKL */
> > 
> > And really it doesn't seem to protect anything else,
> > fortunately it is acquired in a short path.
> 
> As I said in my reply, this is the tough one, because the BKL protection
> is imposed by the VFS locking scheme used in fs/locks.c.
> 
> There is a similar dependency imposed upon fs/lockd/



Ok.


> > fs/nfs/super.c: unlock_kernel();
> > fs/nfs/super.c: unlock_kernel();
> > 
> > Protect the mount/unmount path, a bit trickier there.
> > 
> > But really that looks way much easier to fix than it was
> > with reiserfs.
> 
> All the other cases you list should be fixed in the GIT PULL request
> that I just put out.
> 


Cool, thanks a lot!

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/