Re: [PATCH] smc91x: fix unused flags warnings on UP systems

[Andrew Morton]

On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 15:15:02 -0800 (PST) David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed,  9 Dec 2009 08:40:04 -0500
> 
> > Local flags variables will be declared whenever these functions get used,
> > but obviously on UP systems the flags parameter won't be touched.  So add
> > some dummy ops that get optimized away anyways to satisfy gcc's warnings.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Applied, although I thought we had a standard macro to handle this
> kind of case.

Nope.

Coverting them to real C functions fixes the warning, and provides
previously-absent typechecking.  ie, (untested):

--- a/drivers/net/smc91x.c~a
+++ a/drivers/net/smc91x.c
@@ -534,9 +534,18 @@ static inline void  smc_rcv(struct net_d
 #define smc_special_lock(lock, flags)		spin_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)
 #define smc_special_unlock(lock, flags) 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)
 #else
-#define smc_special_trylock(lock, flags)	(1)
-#define smc_special_lock(lock, flags)   	do { } while (0)
-#define smc_special_unlock(lock, flags)	do { } while (0)
+static inline int smc_special_trylock(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
+{
+	return 1;
+}
+
+static inline void smc_special_lock(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
+{
+}
+
+static inline void smc_special_unlock(spinlock_t *lock, unsigned long flags)
+{
+}
 #endif
 
 /*
_


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/