Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: reduce write depth only if sync was delayed

[Corrado Zoccolo]

Hi Jeff,
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> The numbers look good. Now, there is no penalty in having low_latency
>> set for sequential writes, and just a small penalty for random ones.
>> The fact that random reads are faster with low_latency set is interesting.
>> Is the test is running with your patched tiobench (so that the number
>> of random operations is comparable with sequential ones)?
>
> No, I forgot all about that. ÂThe number of random operations defaults
> to 4000, which is pretty low. ÂI'll re-run the tests with a number
> comparable to the sequential runs. ÂSorry about that.
>
N.P.
if you have time, can you also re-run the test changing:
iosched/fifo_expire_async to 8 ?
I hope that reducing the expire_async, will make cfq quicker at switching
between the different threads, allowing more parallelism for seq
writers on your hw.
If this is the case, I think I can try to estimate the
fifo_expire_async in the autotuning patch.

> Cheers,
> Jeff
>

Thanks
Corrado
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/