Re: [patch 1/9] sys: Fix missing rcu protection for __task_cred() access

[David Howells]

Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > > Or are there updates that are carried out without write-holding
> > > tasklist_lock that I am missing?
> > 
> > Yes, commit_creds() is called lockless.
> 
> Right, and that's what the problem is. commit_creds(), which rcu frees
> the old creds, does not take tasklist lock write lock.

commit_creds() does not need to hold a write lock, because it is implicitly
write-locked by only being permitted to run in the thread to which it is
committing.

I don't think commit_creds() needs to take the RCU read lock as no-one else
can alter/delete the creds it is dealing with.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/