Re: [PATCH] irq: handle irq0 special only on x86

[H. Peter Anvin]

On 12/10/2009 12:24 AM, Uwe Kleine-KÃnig wrote:
> 
> Note, I fully agree to use 0 for NO_IRQ if you have an int-sized value
> that holds either NO_IRQ or a valid irq number.  But in practise I'd not
> recommend to use this idiom.
> 

You're tilting at windmills about something that was settled long ago,
like it or not.

	-hpa

-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/