Re: [GIT PULL] x86/paravirt for v2.6.33

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Wed Dec 09 2009 - 13:48:13 EST




On Wed, 9 Dec 2009, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> How does this look?

I would actually prefer it if the calling convention was just made to
match on both x86 and x86-64. Wouldn't it be nice if they both just had

> +/* kernel/ioport.c */
> +asmlinkage long sys_iopl(unsigned int, struct pt_regs *);

as the prototype, and looked the same?

I realize that right now the 32-bit PTREGSCALL() thing doesn't support
that (very different macros for entry.S x86-32 and -64), but isn't that
just another thing we should try to fix too?

IOW, maybe something like this would be good, and would change the x86-32
calling convention to match the x86-64 one?

NOTE NOTE NOTE! Totally untested. Is the second argument even in %edx? I
don't remember, I didn't check, I'm just throwing this out as a "hey,
maybe something _like_ this can work" patch, and will be immediately
removing it from my machine after sending this email.

Linus

---
arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
index 50b9c22..22b4431 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
@@ -725,22 +725,22 @@ END(syscall_badsys)
/*
* System calls that need a pt_regs pointer.
*/
-#define PTREGSCALL(name) \
+#define PTREGSCALL(name, reg) \
ALIGN; \
ptregs_##name: \
- leal 4(%esp),%eax; \
+ leal 4(%esp),reg; \
jmp sys_##name;

-PTREGSCALL(iopl)
-PTREGSCALL(fork)
-PTREGSCALL(clone)
-PTREGSCALL(vfork)
-PTREGSCALL(execve)
-PTREGSCALL(sigaltstack)
-PTREGSCALL(sigreturn)
-PTREGSCALL(rt_sigreturn)
-PTREGSCALL(vm86)
-PTREGSCALL(vm86old)
+PTREGSCALL(iopl,%edx)
+PTREGSCALL(fork,%eax)
+PTREGSCALL(clone,%eax)
+PTREGSCALL(vfork,%eax)
+PTREGSCALL(execve,%eax)
+PTREGSCALL(sigaltstack,%eax)
+PTREGSCALL(sigreturn,%eax)
+PTREGSCALL(rt_sigreturn,%eax)
+PTREGSCALL(vm86,%eax)
+PTREGSCALL(vm86old,%eax)

.macro FIXUP_ESPFIX_STACK
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/